What were the outcomes?


Why was a Summit necessary?

 

What was the process?

 

Who were the organizers?

 

Who was represented?

 

How were delegates chosen?

 

Why Future Search?

 

 

October 20-22, 2011
Airlie Center
Warrenton, VA

info@homebirthsummit.org

 

 

Why Dialogue Was Needed

Rates of planned home birth in the US have remained low for several decades, but women are increasing their interest in this option. Women today want and expect choices for childbirth without compromising quality of care. Choice of birth site - home, hospital, or birth center - is not an option for many expectant mothers in the United States.

Safety of birth in any setting is of utmost priority. Maternity care providers and researchers in the US disagree about appropriate settings for birth. Ultimately, women and families are ill-served by inter-professional conflict. The current debate on home birth in the US indicates the need for constructive discussion and consensus-building. Successful collaboration between health professionals has been found to result in improved experience and outcomes for consumers.

The meeting was organized in a way that is most likely to foster the dialogue needed to find common ground and spark constructive action that will ultimately benefit all stakeholder groups. This summit encouraged dialogue among health care professionals, consumers, policy makers, and other leaders from disciplines that support maternity care, with the shared goal of identifying a common agenda for the provision of birth services in the United States.

The point was not to debate the rightness or wrongness of homebirth. The goal was to establish what the whole system can do to support those who choose homebirth, and provide the care, safety net, consultation, collaboration and referral necessary to make homebirth the safest and most positive experience for all involved moms, babies, families, communities, health care workers, hospital personnel, administrators, payors, and so on.