What were the outcomes?


Why was a Summit necessary?

 

What was the process?

 

Who were the organizers?

 

Who was represented?

 

How were delegates chosen?

 

Why Future Search?

 

 

October 20-22, 2011
Airlie Center
Warrenton, VA

info@homebirthsummit.org

 

 

What was the process?

Engaging in dialogue: The Future Search model

This Summit was not a conference. It was a meeting that was entirely interactive: no speakers, no papers. It was a gathering of multiple stakeholders who engaged in frank and productive conversations about how to best support and care for women who choose to give birth at home.

Delegates at the 2011 Summit created a map of trends in the world having an impact on Home Birth and used it to discuss a world that includes all perceptions.

Delegates explored every facet of the existing system and proposed ways to move forward in the future. All stakeholder delegates were engaged in this consensus-building process.

To ensure that common goals were met, the Summit was facilitated by Sandra Janoff, PhD, Co-Director of Future Search Network and co-developer of the Future Search methodology. This planning method has been used successfully around the world for complex issues, including social and health-related situations, where all parties have unique experiences and there are no obvious answers. Future Search meetings use a highly-structured methodology, which encourages self-management, innovation, and responsibility for action by participants before, during, and after the meeting. Through the formalized process for building a common ground agenda, constructive actions are articulated, including taking responsibility for what happens next. However, at the onset of the meeting there are no pre-set goals or objectives. The agenda, committed to by all, is determined entirely through the collective process that considered all viewpoints.

By the close of this Summit, the stakeholders and leaders present arrived at nine statements which represent areas of common ground and shared priorities for further discussion and action. Several newly formed multi-disciplinary workgroups agreed to carry initiatives forward. Simultaneously many individuals identified personal commitments within their own spheres of influence related to improving conditions for women planning home birth. Other leaders reported on their plans to review the vision statements with their national organizations and constituents for endorsement, commentary, and/or action.